Key Takeaways

• Only 1% of defense contractors are fully prepared for CMMC 2.0 assessments despite the program becoming mandatory in 2025, with 80,000 contractors needing Level 2 certification but only 270 currently holding certificates 
• CMMC Level 3 explicitly requires annual penetration testing while Level 2 mandates vulnerability scanning every 90 days—smart contractors conduct penetration testing at all levels to validate their security posture 
• Preparation for CMMC certification takes 6-18 months on average, with assessment costs starting at $50,000 and the potential loss of billions in DoD contracts for non-compliant organizations

The defense industrial base faces a stark reality in 2025: comply with the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0 requirements or lose access to over $849 billion in Department of Defense contracts. Yet despite years of advance warning, recent studies reveal that only 1% of defense contractors feel fully prepared for the assessments that will determine their future in the defense supply chain.

This isn't just another compliance checkbox. The CMMC program represents a fundamental shift in how the DoD approaches supply chain security, moving from self-attestation to verified third-party assessments. For the thousands of manufacturers, software vendors, consultants, and service providers that make up the defense industrial base, penetration testing has evolved from a best practice to a business-critical requirement that could determine whether you'll still have DoD contracts by 2028.

The stakes couldn't be higher. With nation-state actors increasingly targeting defense contractors as the softer underbelly of national security, the DoD has made it clear: demonstrate robust, validated cybersecurity or find a different customer. For organizations handling Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI), that validation increasingly means penetration testing—not just vulnerability scanning, but actual simulated attacks that prove your defenses can withstand real-world threats.

Understanding CMMC 2.0 and Its Impact

The Evolution from CMMC 1.0 to 2.0

When the DoD introduced CMMC 1.0 in January 2020, the defense industrial base pushed back hard. The original five-level framework proved too complex, too expensive, and too rigid for the diverse ecosystem of contractors supporting defense programs. Small manufacturers struggled with the same requirements as major defense primes, and the one-size-fits-all approach threatened to push thousands of capable suppliers out of the defense market.

CMMC 2.0, announced in November 2021 and finalized with the publication of 32 CFR Part 170 in December 2024, streamlines the framework while maintaining its core security objectives. The simplified three-level structure aligns directly with existing NIST standards, eliminating redundant requirements while preserving the verification mechanisms that ensure real security, not just paper compliance.

The key changes reflect lessons learned from both industry feedback and evolving threats:

• Simplified Structure: The five maturity levels collapsed to three, directly mapping to the sensitivity of information handled. This allows organizations to right-size their security investments based on actual risk.
• Aligned Standards: Rather than creating new security requirements, CMMC 2.0 builds directly on NIST SP 800-171 for Level 2 and adds selected controls from NIST SP 800-172 for Level 3. Organizations already working toward NIST compliance aren't starting from scratch.
• Flexible Assessment: Level 1 organizations handling only Federal Contract Information (FCI) can self-assess annually. Some Level 2 organizations may also self-assess, though most will require third-party validation. This tiered approach balances security needs with implementation costs.

The Three Levels of CMMC 2.0

Understanding which level applies to your organization is the first step in developing a compliance strategy:

• Level 1 (Foundational): Organizations that handle only FCI—not CUI—fall into this category. Think of suppliers providing commercial off-the-shelf products, janitorial services, or food services to DoD facilities. These organizations must implement 15 basic security practices from FAR 52.204-21, including antivirus software, strong passwords, and physical access controls. Annual self-assessment and affirmation suffice for Level 1, making it accessible for small businesses with limited security resources.
• Level 2 (Advanced): The majority of defense contractors fall here, as this level applies to any organization that processes, stores, or transmits CUI. This includes manufacturers producing defense components, software developers creating military applications, and engineering firms designing defense systems. Level 2 requires full implementation of all 110 security controls from NIST SP 800-171, covering everything from access control and incident response to system monitoring and vulnerability management. Most Level 2 organizations must undergo triennial assessment by a CMMC Third Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO) certified by the CMMC Accreditation Body.
• Level 3 (Expert): Reserved for contractors supporting critical national security programs or handling CUI associated with high-value assets, Level 3 builds on Level 2 by adding 24 enhanced security requirements from NIST SP 800-172. These additional controls focus on advanced persistent threat defense, including mandatory penetration testing, enhanced incident response capabilities, and sophisticated threat hunting. Assessment occurs every three years through the Defense Industrial Base Cybersecurity Assessment Center (DIBCAC), with only about 1% of contractors expected to require this level.

The Current State of DIB Readiness

The numbers paint a troubling picture. Despite the CMMC program's multi-year development and extensive industry engagement, the 2025 State of the DIB Report reveals shocking gaps in readiness:

• Self-Assessment Disconnect: While 69% of contractors claim compliance through self-assessment, only 30% have completed medium or high assessments that would validate their actual security posture. This gap between perceived and actual compliance creates a false sense of security that could prove catastrophic when formal assessments begin.
• SPRS Score Deficiencies: The median Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS) score sits at 60, far below the required 110 for CMMC Level 2. Even more concerning, 17% of contractors report negative scores, indicating fundamental security gaps that could take months to remediate.
• Financial Impact Already Visible: Nearly 90% of defense contractors report experiencing financial, reputational, or business losses due to cyber incidents. These aren't hypothetical risks—they're current realities impacting operations, disrupting supply chains, and costing millions in remediation.

The readiness crisis extends beyond technical controls. Many organizations underestimate the documentation, process maturity, and cultural changes required for CMMC certification. It's not enough to have security tools in place; you must prove they're properly configured, consistently used, and regularly validated through testing.

Penetration Testing Requirements in CMMC 2.0

When Penetration Testing Becomes Mandatory

The CMMC framework takes a nuanced approach to penetration testing requirements, recognizing that not all contractors face the same threat landscape or handle equally sensitive information:

• Level 1: No explicit penetration testing requirement exists at this level, though organizations should consider periodic testing as part of general security hygiene. The 15 basic practices focus on fundamental protections rather than advanced validation techniques.
• Level 2: While NIST SP 800-171 doesn't mandate penetration testing for all scenarios, it becomes required when custom software applications are used to process, store, or transmit CUI. Control 3.11.2 specifies that organizations must conduct vulnerability scans periodically and when new vulnerabilities affecting systems are identified. For custom applications, this requirement often necessitates penetration testing to properly assess security.
• Level 3: This is where penetration testing becomes non-negotiable. The enhanced security requirements from NIST SP 800-172 explicitly require annual penetration testing of organizational systems. Control 3.11.3e mandates that organizations "Employ penetration testing to validate the effectiveness of the security controls." This isn't optional or addressable—it's a hard requirement for Level 3 certification.

NIST SP 800-171 and Vulnerability Management

Understanding the relationship between CMMC and NIST requirements is crucial for developing an effective testing strategy. NIST SP 800-171 Requirement 3.11.2 forms the foundation of vulnerability management for Level 2 organizations:

• Scanning Requirements: Organizations must scan for vulnerabilities in information systems and applications periodically and when new vulnerabilities are identified. The frequency isn't specified, allowing organizations to determine appropriate intervals based on risk assessment, but industry best practice suggests at least quarterly scanning.
• Scope of Testing: Vulnerability scanning must cover all systems that create, process, store, or transmit CUI. This includes networks, servers, workstations, databases, and applications. Cloud environments, often overlooked, require equal attention.
• Custom Software Considerations: For organizations using custom-developed applications, basic vulnerability scanning isn't sufficient. NIST acknowledges that custom software requires additional approaches including static analysis, dynamic analysis, binary analysis, or hybrid methods. This is where penetration testing becomes essential—automated scans can't identify business logic flaws or complex attack chains that human testers uncover.
• Remediation Expectations: Identifying vulnerabilities is only the first step. Requirement 3.11.3 mandates remediation in accordance with risk assessments. This means establishing remediation timelines based on severity, implementing compensating controls when patches aren't immediately available, and documenting risk acceptance decisions for vulnerabilities that cannot be remediated.

NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Requirements

For Level 3 organizations, NIST SP 800-172 elevates security expectations significantly. The enhanced requirements acknowledge that advanced persistent threats require more sophisticated validation techniques:

• Penetration-Resistant Architecture: Control 3.13.2e requires organizations to implement and validate a penetration-resistant architecture. This goes beyond basic penetration testing to include red team exercises, assumed breach scenarios, and purple team collaborations that improve defensive capabilities.
• Threat-Informed Testing: Rather than generic penetration tests, Level 3 organizations must conduct threat-informed assessments that simulate the specific tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) used by nation-state actors targeting defense information. This requires testers with deep understanding of advanced threat actors and their methods.
• Continuous Validation: Annual penetration testing represents the minimum requirement. Level 3 organizations should implement continuous security validation through automated breach and attack simulation, regular tabletop exercises, and periodic red team engagements that test not just technical controls but also personnel and processes.

Beyond Compliance: Why All Levels Should Consider Penetration Testing

While CMMC only explicitly requires penetration testing at Level 3, smart contractors at all levels are incorporating it into their security programs. Here's why:

• Prime Contractor Requirements: Major defense primes increasingly require their suppliers to demonstrate security through penetration testing, regardless of CMMC level. If you want to maintain relationships with companies like Lockheed Martin, Boeing, or Raytheon, expect penetration testing requirements in subcontract flow-downs.
• Competitive Differentiation: In a market where only 1% of contractors feel fully prepared for CMMC, demonstrated security becomes a competitive advantage. Organizations that can show penetration testing reports alongside their CMMC certification stand out in competitive bidding.
• Risk Reduction: The average cost of a data breach in the defense industrial base exceeds $4.5 million. A penetration test costing $25,000-$100,000 that prevents even one incident provides exceptional return on investment.
• Assessment Preparation: C3PAOs will probe your security during assessment. Organizations that have already undergone penetration testing know their vulnerabilities and have addressed them before the official assessment, reducing the risk of failure and costly remediation.

Key Components of CMMC-Compliant Penetration Testing

Scope Definition and Asset Inventory

Effective penetration testing for CMMC compliance begins with comprehensive scope definition. This isn't just about identifying IP addresses to scan—it's about understanding how CUI flows through your organization:

• CUI Data Flow Mapping: Before testing begins, map every system that touches CUI. This includes obvious targets like file servers and databases, but also peripheral systems like backup infrastructure, development environments, and administrative workstations that could provide lateral movement paths to CUI.
• Enclave vs. Enterprise Testing: Many organizations implement CUI enclaves to limit the scope of CMMC compliance. If you've segregated CUI processing into a dedicated environment, ensure penetration testing covers both the enclave itself and potential breach points from the enterprise network. Attackers don't respect your scoping boundaries.
• Cloud and Hybrid Environments: With increasing cloud adoption, penetration testing must cover not just on-premise infrastructure but also cloud services, SaaS applications, and hybrid connections. Organizations leveraging cloud engineering services can build security into their cloud architecture from the start. Ensure your testing includes cloud configuration reviews, API security assessments, and identity and access management validations.
• Third-Party Connections: Every connection to a business partner, managed service provider, or cloud service represents a potential attack vector. Include these integration points in your penetration testing scope, validating that security controls extend across organizational boundaries.

Testing Methodologies and Standards

CMMC-compliant penetration testing should follow established methodologies that ensure comprehensive, repeatable results:

• PTES (Penetration Testing Execution Standard): This comprehensive framework covers pre-engagement interactions, intelligence gathering, threat modeling, vulnerability analysis, exploitation, post-exploitation, and reporting. PTES provides the structure needed for thorough testing that satisfies CMMC requirements.
• OWASP Testing Guide: For web applications processing CUI, the OWASP Web Security Testing Guide offers detailed methodologies for identifying vulnerabilities in custom applications. Given that web applications often represent the easiest attack vector, this focused testing is essential.
• MITRE ATT&CK Framework: Level 3 organizations should ensure penetration testing maps to MITRE ATT&CK techniques used by advanced persistent threats. This alignment helps validate that security controls effectively defend against real-world adversary behaviors.
• NIST SP 800-115: This technical guide to information security testing and assessment provides the authoritative framework for federal systems. Following NIST guidance ensures your penetration testing meets government expectations for thoroughness and documentation.

Types of Testing Required

CMMC compliance demands multiple types of penetration testing to validate different aspects of your security program:

• External Network Penetration Testing: Simulates attacks from outside your network perimeter, testing internet-facing services, VPN endpoints, web applications, and email security. This validates that external attackers cannot breach your defenses to access CUI.
• Internal Network Penetration Testing: Assumes an attacker has gained initial network access—through phishing, physical access, or compromised credentials—and tests lateral movement capabilities, privilege escalation paths, and access to CUI repositories. This is crucial for validating network segmentation and least privilege implementations.
• Web Application Penetration Testing: For organizations with custom applications handling CUI, dedicated application testing goes beyond automated scanning to identify business logic flaws, authorization bypasses, and data exposure risks that could compromise CUI confidentiality.
• Wireless Penetration Testing: If wireless networks exist in facilities processing CUI, testing must validate that wireless security prevents unauthorized access and that compromised wireless networks cannot reach CUI systems.
• Social Engineering Assessment: While not always required, social engineering tests validate security awareness training effectiveness. Phishing simulations, vishing campaigns, and physical security tests ensure personnel represent strong first-line defense rather than the weakest link.

Documentation and Reporting Standards

CMMC assessors expect comprehensive documentation of penetration testing activities. Your reports must demonstrate not just that testing occurred, but that it was thorough, professional, and resulted in meaningful security improvements:

• Executive Summary: Provide clear, business-focused overview of testing results, critical findings, and overall risk posture. Executives and CMMC assessors should understand the security implications without diving into technical details.
• Technical Findings: Document each vulnerability with sufficient detail for remediation, including affected systems, exploitation steps, evidence screenshots, and potential impact on CUI. Use standard scoring systems like CVSS to prioritize remediation efforts.
• Remediation Roadmap: Don't just identify problems—provide actionable solutions. Include specific remediation recommendations, implementation priorities based on risk, and compensating controls for vulnerabilities that cannot be immediately addressed.
• Evidence of Remediation: CMMC assessors want to see that you act on penetration testing findings. Maintain records of remediation activities, validation testing, and risk acceptance decisions for findings that remain unresolved.

Building Your CMMC Penetration Testing Program

Selecting the Right Testing Partner

Choosing a penetration testing partner for CMMC compliance requires careful evaluation beyond just technical capabilities:

• CMMC Expertise: Your testing partner should understand CMMC requirements, NIST controls, and DoD expectations. Generic penetration testers may miss compliance-specific considerations that could impact your certification. Look for partners with demonstrated experience in defense industrial base assessments. Consider engaging virtual CISO services to guide your overall CMMC strategy.
• Clearance and Citizenship Requirements: Some CUI categories require testers to be U.S. citizens or hold security clearances. Verify your testing partner can meet any special requirements before engagement begins. International testing firms may be prohibited from accessing certain types of CUI.
• C3PAO Relationships: While the same organization cannot both prepare you for assessment and conduct your official assessment, understanding C3PAO expectations is valuable. Choose testers familiar with C3PAO assessment processes who can help you prepare for official certification.
• Comprehensive Capabilities: CMMC compliance requires more than just network penetration testing. Ensure your partner can assess applications, cloud environments, wireless networks, and physical security as needed. Multiple vendors increase complexity and may miss integration vulnerabilities.
• Documentation Excellence: Given documentation's importance in CMMC assessment, evaluate potential partners' sample reports. Clear, comprehensive, actionable reporting is as important as technical testing quality. Poor documentation could undermine even the best technical testing.

Internal vs. External Testing Teams

Organizations must decide whether to build internal penetration testing capabilities or rely on external partners:

Internal Team Advantages:

• Deep understanding of your environment and CUI flows
• Ability to conduct frequent, targeted testing
• Immediate availability for incident validation
• Long-term cost efficiency for large organizations

Internal Team Challenges:

• Difficulty maintaining objectivity and fresh perspective
• Challenge recruiting and retaining qualified testers
• Limited exposure to diverse environments and attack techniques
• Potential conflicts of interest in reporting findings

External Team Advantages:

• Independent validation that carries more weight with assessors
• Broad experience across multiple organizations and sectors
• Access to specialized expertise and tools
• Clear documentation without internal political considerations

Hybrid Approach: Many successful organizations combine internal and external testing. Internal teams conduct frequent validation testing and purple team exercises, while external teams provide annual independent assessments that satisfy CMMC requirements. This balances cost, frequency, and independence.

Frequency and Timing Considerations

While CMMC specifies minimum testing frequencies, optimal timing requires strategic planning:

Annual Baseline: Level 3 organizations must conduct penetration testing at least annually. Schedule these assessments consistently, allowing time for remediation before your next CMMC assessment. Many organizations test in Q1, providing maximum time for fixes before year-end reviews.

Triggered Testing: Beyond scheduled assessments, certain events should trigger additional penetration testing:

• Major infrastructure changes or migrations
• Deployment of new CUI-processing applications
• Significant security incidents or breaches
• Merger, acquisition, or major organizational changes
• Discovery of new threat actors targeting your sector

Continuous Validation: Annual penetration testing represents a point-in-time snapshot. Implement continuous validation through:

• Quarterly vulnerability assessments
• Monthly configuration audits
• Automated breach and attack simulation
• Regular red team exercises for critical systems

Pre-Assessment Testing: Schedule penetration testing at least six months before your official CMMC assessment. This provides time to identify issues, implement fixes, and conduct validation testing confirming remediation effectiveness. Rushing fixes immediately before assessment increases risk of incomplete remediation or system instability.

Budget Planning and ROI

Penetration testing represents a significant but necessary investment in your CMMC compliance program:

Testing Costs: Expect to invest $25,000-$50,000 for basic annual penetration testing, with comprehensive assessments for larger organizations reaching $100,000 or more. Costs vary based on:

• Scope and complexity of environment
• Number of applications requiring testing
• Geographic distribution of facilities
• Required security clearances for testers
• Depth of testing and reporting requirements

Hidden Costs: Beyond the testing itself, budget for:

• Internal staff time supporting testing activities
• Remediation efforts for identified vulnerabilities
• Potential system downtime during testing
• Follow-up validation testing
• Documentation and process improvements

ROI Calculation: While penetration testing costs seem substantial, consider the alternatives:

• Loss of DoD contracts worth millions annually
• Potential breach costs averaging $4.5 million
• Regulatory fines and legal liabilities
• Reputational damage impacting all business lines
• Competitive disadvantage versus compliant competitors

Cost Optimization Strategies:

• Clearly define scope to avoid unnecessary testing
• Combine multiple assessments for efficiency
• Leverage internal resources for preparation and remediation
• Negotiate multi-year agreements for better rates
• Share costs across programs benefiting from improved security

Common Challenges and How to Overcome Them

Technical Debt and Legacy Systems

Many defense contractors struggle with aging infrastructure that predates modern security requirements:

Challenge: Legacy systems running unsupported operating systems, applications without vendor support, and industrial control systems that cannot be patched without extensive downtime create significant vulnerabilities that penetration testing will expose.

Solution: Develop a strategic modernization plan that prioritizes CUI-touching systems. Where replacement isn't immediately feasible, implement compensating controls:

• Network segmentation isolating legacy systems
• Enhanced monitoring and anomaly detection
• Application whitelisting preventing unauthorized changes
• Increased physical security for critical legacy components
• Documentation of risk acceptance with remediation timeline

Remember that CMMC assessors understand legacy system challenges but expect clear plans for addressing them. Penetration testing helps justify modernization investments by quantifying risk.

Resource Constraints

Small and medium contractors face particular challenges in building comprehensive penetration testing programs:

Challenge: Limited security staff, competing priorities, and restricted budgets make it difficult to implement robust testing programs that satisfy CMMC requirements while maintaining business operations.

Solution: Focus resources strategically:

• Implement CUI enclaves to limit compliance scope
• Partner with managed security service providers for expertise
• Leverage automation for continuous monitoring between tests
• Join industry associations for shared threat intelligence
• Consider consortium approaches for shared testing resources

The key is demonstrating that you're maximizing security within available resources rather than ignoring requirements.

Remediation Prioritization

Penetration testing typically reveals numerous findings, creating overwhelming remediation workloads:

Challenge: With dozens or hundreds of findings, organizations struggle to prioritize fixes, balance security with operational needs, and demonstrate progress to assessors.

Solution: Implement a risk-based remediation framework:

1. Critical: CUI directly exposed, fix immediately
2. High: Potential CUI access, remediate within 30 days
3. Medium: Indirect threats, address within 90 days
4. Low: Minimal impact, fix during routine maintenance

Document your prioritization logic, track remediation progress, and maintain evidence of fixes. CMMC assessors want to see systematic approaches to vulnerability management, not perfection.

Stakeholder Buy-In

Convincing leadership to invest in penetration testing before it becomes mandatory can be challenging:

Challenge: Executives may view penetration testing as unnecessary expense, especially if no breaches have occurred. The "it hasn't happened to us" mentality persists despite evidence of widespread targeting of defense contractors.

Solution: Frame penetration testing in business terms:

• Contract retention: Without CMMC compliance, you lose DoD business
• Competitive advantage: Early compliance wins contracts from struggling competitors
• Risk reduction: Testing costs far less than breach remediation
• Insurance benefits: Many cyber insurance policies require penetration testing
• Customer confidence: Prime contractors prefer secure subcontractors

Provide concrete examples of competitors losing contracts or suffering breaches to make risks tangible.

Integration with Overall CMMC Compliance Strategy

Penetration Testing as Validation, Not Preparation

A common mistake is viewing penetration testing as preparation for CMMC assessment. In reality, it validates preparations already made:

Build Security First: Implement NIST SP 800-171 controls fully before penetration testing. Testing an incomplete security program wastes money and provides limited value. Focus initial efforts on control implementation, documentation, and process maturity.

Test to Validate: Use penetration testing to confirm that implemented controls work as designed. Testing should verify that:

• Network segmentation actually prevents lateral movement
• Access controls effectively limit CUI access
• Monitoring systems detect and alert on attacks
• Incident response procedures activate appropriately

Iterate and Improve: Penetration testing findings feed continuous improvement. Each test should show fewer critical findings and more sophisticated attack requirements, demonstrating security program maturation.

Coordinating with Other Assessment Activities

Penetration testing is one element of comprehensive CMMC preparation requiring careful coordination:

• Gap Assessment First: Conduct a thorough gap assessment against CMMC requirements before penetration testing. Address obvious control gaps through implementation rather than expensive testing that confirms known weaknesses.
• Vulnerability Scanning Foundation: Regular vulnerability scanning should precede penetration testing. Fix known vulnerabilities identified by automated scanning so penetration testers can focus on complex attack chains and business logic flaws that automation misses.
• Documentation Review: Ensure policies, procedures, and system security plans are complete before testing. Penetration testing validates that documented controls match actual implementation. Inconsistencies between documentation and reality create assessment failures.
• Tabletop Exercises: Conduct incident response tabletop exercises before penetration testing. This prepares your team to respond effectively when testers trigger alerts, turning testing into valuable training opportunity.
• Assessment Readiness Review: After penetration testing and remediation, conduct a pre-assessment readiness review. This mock assessment identifies any remaining gaps before official C3PAO assessment, providing final opportunity for corrections.

Continuous Improvement Through Testing

CMMC compliance isn't a one-time achievement but an ongoing commitment requiring continuous validation:

Metrics and Trending: Track penetration testing metrics over time:

• Time to initial compromise
• Number of critical findings
• Remediation completion rates
• Mean time to detect and respond
• Percentage of successful attack paths to CUI

Improving trends demonstrate program maturity to assessors and leadership.

Lessons Learned: Each penetration test provides learning opportunities beyond just technical findings:

• Which controls failed under pressure?
• Where did processes break down?
• What training gaps became apparent?
• How can detection improve?

Document lessons learned and incorporate them into security program improvements.

Purple Team Collaboration: Rather than adversarial red team/blue team dynamics, adopt purple team approaches where testers work with defenders to improve security. This collaborative model:

• Transfers attacker knowledge to defensive teams
• Tests and improves detection capabilities
• Validates incident response procedures
• Builds internal security expertise

Future-Proofing Your Penetration Testing Program

Evolving Threat Landscape

The threats facing defense contractors continue evolving, requiring adaptive penetration testing approaches:

Nation-State Tactics: Advanced persistent threats targeting defense information employ sophisticated techniques requiring equally sophisticated testing:

• Supply chain compromises targeting trust relationships
• Zero-day exploits in widely-used software
• Living-off-the-land techniques using legitimate tools
• Long-term persistent access with minimal footprint

Penetration testing must evolve beyond basic vulnerability exploitation to simulate these advanced threats.

Ransomware Evolution: Modern ransomware attacks combine data encryption with data theft, threatening both availability and confidentiality of CUI. Testing should validate:

• Backup integrity and restoration capabilities
• Network segmentation limiting ransomware spread
• Detection of ransomware precursor activities
• Response procedures minimizing impact

Cloud and Container Threats: As defense contractors modernize infrastructure, new attack surfaces emerge:

• Misconfigured cloud storage exposing CUI
• Container escape vulnerabilities
• Serverless function injection attacks
• API authentication and authorization flaws

Organizations using managed cloud services can ensure security keeps pace with modernization. Ensure penetration testing expertise keeps pace with your infrastructure modernization.

Regulatory Changes and Updates

CMMC requirements will continue evolving as threats and technologies change:

CMMC 3.0 Preparations: While CMMC 2.0 just launched, the DoD already signals future enhancements. Anticipated changes include:

• Increased automation requirements for continuous validation
• Enhanced supply chain security validations
• Specific requirements for emerging technologies
• Stricter remediation timelines

Build flexibility into your penetration testing program to accommodate evolving requirements without major restructuring.

Cross-Regulation Alignment: Many defense contractors face multiple regulatory frameworks:

• ITAR for export-controlled information
• HIPAA for healthcare-related contracts
• PCI DSS for payment processing
• State privacy regulations

Design penetration testing programs that satisfy multiple frameworks efficiently, avoiding redundant testing while ensuring comprehensive coverage.

Automation and Continuous Testing

The future of penetration testing combines human expertise with automated validation:

Breach and Attack Simulation: Automated platforms continuously simulate attacks, providing ongoing validation between manual penetration tests. This technology:

• Tests security controls daily rather than annually
• Identifies configuration drift immediately
• Validates that patches don't break security controls
• Provides metrics demonstrating continuous compliance

AI-Enhanced Testing: Artificial intelligence augments human testers by:

• Identifying unusual attack paths humans might miss
• Correlating vulnerabilities across large infrastructures
• Predicting exploitation likelihood based on threat intelligence
• Automating report generation and remediation prioritization

DevSecOps Integration: As development accelerates, penetration testing must shift left:

• API security testing in CI/CD pipelines
• Infrastructure-as-code security validation
• Container and microservices testing
• Automated security regression testing

Organizations that integrate security testing throughout development rather than bolting it on at the end achieve better security with less friction.

The transition from self-attestation to verified compliance through CMMC 2.0 represents a watershed moment for the defense industrial base. With only 1% of contractors fully prepared and 80,000 organizations needing Level 2 certification against only 270 current certificate holders, the math is stark: thousands of companies risk losing their place in the defense supply chain.

Penetration testing stands at the center of this transformation. Whether explicitly required at Level 3 or strategically adopted at lower levels, it provides the validation that security controls work when facing real attacks. In an environment where 90% of contractors have already suffered cyber incidents, penetration testing isn't about compliance—it's about survival.

The path forward requires immediate action. With CMMC requirements appearing in contracts by late 2025 and full implementation by 2028, the window for preparation is closing. Organizations that begin comprehensive penetration testing now, identify and remediate vulnerabilities, and build mature security programs will capture contracts from unprepared competitors.

Success requires more than just scheduling an annual penetration test. It demands integration of testing into broader security programs, coordination with CMMC preparation activities, and commitment to continuous improvement. Organizations must view penetration testing not as a compliance burden but as competitive advantage in an increasingly security-conscious market. Partnering with experienced cybersecurity consultants can accelerate your path to compliance while building sustainable security capabilities.

The defense industrial base stands at an inflection point. Companies that embrace penetration testing and achieve CMMC compliance will thrive in the next era of defense contracting. Those that delay or minimize their efforts risk joining the 99% of contractors scrambling for compliance as deadlines approach and C3PAO availability dwindles.

The question isn't whether you'll implement penetration testing for CMMC compliance—it's whether you'll do it proactively from a position of strength or reactively from a position of desperation. The choice, and its consequences, rest with you.

FAQ Section

Q: Is penetration testing explicitly required for CMMC Level 2?

A: While CMMC Level 2 doesn't universally mandate penetration testing, it becomes required when custom software applications handle CUI. NIST SP 800-171 Requirement 3.11.2 specifies vulnerability scanning that, for custom applications, typically necessitates penetration testing to properly assess security. Additionally, many prime contractors require penetration testing from their Level 2 suppliers regardless of strict CMMC requirements. Smart organizations conduct penetration testing at Level 2 to validate security controls and prepare for assessment.

Q: How much does CMMC penetration testing typically cost?

A: Penetration testing costs vary significantly based on scope and complexity. Small organizations might spend $25,000-$50,000 annually for basic testing, while large contractors with multiple facilities and complex systems could invest $100,000-$250,000 or more. Factors affecting cost include the number of external IP addresses, web applications requiring testing, physical locations, and tester clearance requirements. Remember that penetration testing is just one component—C3PAO assessments themselves start around $50,000, with total CMMC compliance costs potentially reaching hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Q: Can we use the same company for penetration testing and CMMC assessment?

A: No. CMMC rules explicitly prohibit the same organization from both preparing you for assessment (including penetration testing) and conducting your official C3PAO assessment. This prevents conflicts of interest and ensures independent validation. However, you can use one firm for penetration testing and gap assessments, then engage a different C3PAO for official certification. Many organizations find value in having their penetration testing partner familiar with CMMC requirements even though they cannot perform the official assessment.

Q: How often should we conduct penetration testing for CMMC compliance?

A: CMMC Level 3 explicitly requires annual penetration testing at minimum. For Level 2, while not always mandatory, annual testing has become industry standard. However, certain events should trigger additional testing regardless of schedule: major infrastructure changes, new CUI-processing applications, security incidents, mergers or acquisitions, and discovery of new threats targeting your sector. Many organizations also conduct smaller, focused tests quarterly to maintain continuous validation between annual comprehensive assessments.

Q: What's the difference between vulnerability scanning and penetration testing?

A: Vulnerability scanning uses automated tools to identify known security weaknesses across your infrastructure—think of it as a broad but shallow assessment that quickly identifies common issues. Penetration testing involves skilled security professionals manually attempting to exploit vulnerabilities and chain them together to achieve specific objectives, like accessing CUI. While scanning might identify an outdated server, penetration testing shows whether an attacker could actually use that server to pivot to your CUI repositories. CMMC requires vulnerability scanning at Level 2 and both scanning and penetration testing at Level 3.

Q: How long does CMMC penetration testing take?

A: The testing itself typically takes 1-3 weeks depending on scope, but the full timeline extends much longer. Plan for 2-4 weeks of pre-engagement scoping and contracting, 1-3 weeks of active testing, 1-2 weeks for report development, and potentially months for remediation depending on findings. For CMMC preparation, start penetration testing at least six months before your planned C3PAO assessment to allow adequate time for fixes and validation testing. Rushed remediation increases the risk of incomplete fixes or system instability.

Q: Can we fail CMMC assessment due to penetration testing findings?

A: Penetration testing findings themselves don't directly cause CMMC assessment failure—it's the underlying control failures they reveal that matter. If penetration testing exposes missing or ineffective controls required by your CMMC level, you must remediate these before assessment. C3PAOs will review your penetration testing reports and remediation evidence. Unaddressed critical findings, especially those providing direct access to CUI, could result in assessment failure. However, properly documented remediation and risk acceptance for lower-priority findings typically satisfy assessors.

Q: What qualifications should our penetration testers have?

A: Look for testers with both technical expertise and CMMC knowledge. Relevant certifications include OSCP (Offensive Security Certified Professional), GPEN (GIAC Penetration Tester), or CEH (Certified Ethical Hacker) for technical skills. CMMC Certified Professionals (CCP) or CMMC Certified Assessors (CCA) demonstrate understanding of compliance requirements. Experience with DoD or defense contractor assessments is valuable. For some CUI categories, U.S. citizenship or security clearances may be required. Verify professional liability insurance and request references from similar organizations.

Q: Should we fix everything before or after penetration testing?

A: Fix known issues before penetration testing to maximize value. Run vulnerability scans and remediate identified problems before engaging testers—paying experts to find issues your scanners already identified wastes money. However, don't delay testing indefinitely trying to achieve perfection. Penetration testing will always find something, and that's valuable. The goal is to eliminate obvious issues so testers can focus on complex attack chains and business logic flaws that automation misses. Plan for remediation after testing as well.

Q: How do we scope penetration testing for CMMC compliance?

A: Start by identifying all systems that process, store, or transmit CUI—these must be included in testing scope. Add systems that could provide attack paths to CUI, including administrative workstations, authentication systems, and network infrastructure. Consider whether you've implemented CUI enclaves (test both the enclave and boundary controls) or enterprise-wide CUI processing (requiring broader scope). Include cloud services, third-party connections, and wireless networks if present. Document scope decisions clearly, as C3PAO assessors will verify that testing adequately covered your CUI environment. When in doubt, err on the side of comprehensive coverage rather than risk missing critical attack vectors.

‍